Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:70524 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 16293 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2013 22:10:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Dec 2013 22:10:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ajf@ajf.me; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ajf@ajf.me; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ajf.me designates 192.64.116.196 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ajf@ajf.me X-Host-Fingerprint: 192.64.116.196 imap4.ox.registrar-servers.com Received: from [192.64.116.196] ([192.64.116.196:35123] helo=imap4.ox.registrar-servers.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 1C/02-01020-3CC93A25 for ; Sat, 07 Dec 2013 17:10:12 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oxmail.registrar-servers.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55CA8560071; Sat, 7 Dec 2013 17:10:08 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at imap4.ox.registrar-servers.com Received: from oxmail.registrar-servers.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (imap4.ox.registrar-servers.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Eu-6ap6bqCu2; Sat, 7 Dec 2013 17:10:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.13] (unknown [94.13.99.191]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oxmail.registrar-servers.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 627C4560075; Sat, 7 Dec 2013 17:10:03 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <52A39CB7.1090506@ajf.me> Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2013 22:09:59 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Harvey , Nikita Popov CC: PHP internals References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Allowing use of exceptions in the engine From: ajf@ajf.me (Andrea Faulds) On 07/12/13 21:47, Adam Harvey wrote: > > To be clear: I've voted -1 for exactly this reason, and this reason > alone. I don't think implementing this piecemeal (without the > E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR changes) is the right way to go — I would prefer > to have the whole thing as part of a 6.0 release, rather than > potentially confusing users with a partial implementation. > Maybe I'm misunderstanding you here, but if you don't want it piecemeal, surely just vote "Yes"? Or are you saying you want it in 6.0, and also that it shouldn't be piecemeal? -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/