Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:70384 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 52740 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2013 17:52:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Nov 2013 17:52:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=johannes@schlueters.de; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=johannes@schlueters.de; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain schlueters.de from 217.114.215.10 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: johannes@schlueters.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.114.215.10 mail.experimentalworks.net Received: from [217.114.215.10] ([217.114.215.10:57219] helo=mail.experimentalworks.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id B6/09-34377-E5E83925 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 12:52:30 -0500 Received: from [192.168.2.20] (ppp-188-174-50-67.dynamic.mnet-online.de [188.174.50.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: johannes@schlueters.de) by mail.experimentalworks.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A2FC42938; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 18:52:47 +0100 (CET) To: Remi Collet Cc: PHP Internals In-Reply-To: <52937CD5.5080904@fedoraproject.org> References: <1385395857.23451.76.camel@guybrush> <52937CD5.5080904@fedoraproject.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 18:52:10 +0100 Message-ID: <1385401930.23451.85.camel@guybrush> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Allowing [SAPI=] entries in ini files. From: johannes@schlueters.de (Johannes =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Schl=FCter?=) On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 17:37 +0100, Remi Collet wrote: > For downstream distribution, for additionnal extensions we used to only > provide an additional file in php.d, as we cannot change main .ini. The implicit question was: Is there a smarter way to reform ini usage instead of adding yet another thing to mind? johannes