Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:70261
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain chrislondon.co does not designate 74.125.82.174 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CALJZF3gWqkm1=cpEVKbhRfMSar6DT51tAgmrq3Kg7kAfB8ySRg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4E.7B.51208.63ACD825@pb1.pair.com>
	<CAF+90c895QCHqqdfCOjB0KXf9HYm9K90RjUv=-K7=t5kW=__iA@mail.gmail.com>
	<528E1AF6.9050201@php.net>
	<CALJZF3gWqkm1=cpEVKbhRfMSar6DT51tAgmrq3Kg7kAfB8ySRg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 07:46:25 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAjMSDPmb20O=8NZkz_=7h90YkDSZWnsGdr7jczfnR-VCWOjVg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Wallner <mike@php.net>
Cc: Joe Watkins <krakjoe@php.net>, PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>, 
	Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bb04a064bb20004ebb0f636
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: phpdbg
From: me@chrislondon.co (Chris London)

--047d7bb04a064bb20004ebb0f636
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Michael Wallner <mike@php.net> wrote:

> On 21 November 2013 15:38, Joe Watkins <krakjoe@php.net> wrote:
> > On 11/21/2013 02:20 PM, Nikita Popov wrote:
>
> >> I'm probably missing some context here, maybe you could explain how
> phpdbg
> >> differs from something like xdebug? I mean, xdebug seems to be the
> >> de-facto
> >> debugging extension for PHP and has been for a long time, but we're not
> >> bundling it. Why should we bundle phpdbg instead?
> >
> >         This is not an extension, it is a SAPI module. The build system
> does
> > not support external SAPI modules, the implementation requires Zend API
> > which is not exported (or wasn't, has since been patched).
>
> That still does not answer the question, though?!
>
>
My question is very similar. Why not just bundle xdebug?

--047d7bb04a064bb20004ebb0f636--