Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:70258
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.219.54 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4E.7B.51208.63ACD825@pb1.pair.com>
References: <4E.7B.51208.63ACD825@pb1.pair.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:20:07 +0100
Message-ID: <CAF+90c895QCHqqdfCOjB0KXf9HYm9K90RjUv=-K7=t5kW=__iA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joe Watkins <krakjoe@php.net>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3018634d0f904ebb0985c
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: phpdbg
From: nikita.ppv@gmail.com (Nikita Popov)

--001a11c3018634d0f904ebb0985c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Joe Watkins <krakjoe@php.net> wrote:

> Morning Internalz,
>
>         https://wiki.php.net/rfc/phpdbg
>
>         As requested, an RFC for the discussion of including phpdbg in the
> core distribution.
>
>         I have kept it brief, I hope that's not a problem ...
>
> Cheers
> Joe
>

I'm probably missing some context here, maybe you could explain how phpdbg
differs from something like xdebug? I mean, xdebug seems to be the de-facto
debugging extension for PHP and has been for a long time, but we're not
bundling it. Why should we bundle phpdbg instead?

Thanks,
Nikita

--001a11c3018634d0f904ebb0985c--