Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:70214 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 82185 invoked from network); 20 Nov 2013 06:47:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Nov 2013 06:47:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 217.147.176.204 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.147.176.204 mail4.serversure.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [217.147.176.204] ([217.147.176.204:57178] helo=mail4.serversure.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A5/40-14175-3EA5C825 for ; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 01:47:00 -0500 Received: (qmail 11786 invoked by uid 89); 20 Nov 2013 06:46:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO linux-dev4.lsces.org.uk) (lester@rainbowdigitalmedia.org.uk@81.138.11.136) by mail4.serversure.net with ESMTPA; 20 Nov 2013 06:46:56 -0000 Message-ID: <528C5B63.9080809@lsces.co.uk> Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 06:49:07 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/24.0 SeaMonkey/2.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Making "backwards compatibility" discussions more constructive From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) Nikita Popov wrote: > PS: I think that it would be nice to adjust the releaseprocess RFC to > clarify this point, to make things clearer for both contributors and > end-users. The current promise sounds a lot like "You can just update from > 5.4 to 5.5 and won't need to make any code changes", but for any > non-trivial (legacy) codebase that's pretty far from the truth. We have to face the facts here ... When I started writing PHP I could produce code that while written for PHP5 still worked on a PHP4 system. Today that is totally lost - and quite rightly - but even the idea that code written for 5.x will work on 5.x+1 neatly sidesteps the fact that code written for PHP5.2 will not run on the majority of PHP deployments today. YES we can configure a later PHP installation so that legacy code can run, but I would contend that no-one can create an installation today - in an ISP environment - which will allow legacy 5.2 applications to co exist with 5.3/4 applications! Which is why ISP's are having such a hard time moving their clients forward. Added to this reality is the fact that the browser landscape has also moved on in a similar manor. While 5 years ago IE6 was the standard, how many of those applications will actually display on a modern browser? Yes they can be workable, but certainly not tidy to use. I have been bashed every time I say that we need a major shift more often, but while most of the frameworks that use PHP are doing major overhauls every year with a major version as often as anually, PHP is still pretending that 10 year old code is compatible. This is simply not the case, so lets get rid of PHP5.6, get a clean sheet going for PHP6 and allow those of us who have real customers to support get everything up to a level playing field ready to look at a shift to PHP6 some time in the future. As yet even PHP5.5 is not on my own game plan. -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk