Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:70099 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 16130 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2013 19:03:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Nov 2013 19:03:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=swhitemanlistens-software@cypressintegrated.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=swhitemanlistens-software@cypressintegrated.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain cypressintegrated.com designates 173.1.104.101 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: swhitemanlistens-software@cypressintegrated.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 173.1.104.101 rproxy2-b-iv.figureone.com Windows 2000 SP2+, XP SP1 (seldom 98 4.10.2222) Received: from [173.1.104.101] ([173.1.104.101:55094] helo=rproxy2-b-iv.figureone.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 30/A0-11065-91A21825 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:03:54 -0500 Received: from localhost ([216.220.114.66]) by rproxy2-b-iv.figureone.com (Brand New Heavy v1.0) with ASMTP id WEO12251 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:03:51 -0800 Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:03:40 -0500 Reply-To: Sanford Whiteman X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1755993748.20131111140340@cypressintegrated.com> To: Rowan Collins In-Reply-To: <52812873.70406@gmail.com> References: <527DF228.1080108@sugarcrm.com> <416659913.20131110035553@cypressintegrated.com> <127298508.20131110042057@cypressintegrated.com> <97776909.20131110045342@cypressintegrated.com> <527FDE61.70102@gmail.com> <346085145.20131110145938@cypressintegrated.com> <52812873.70406@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Comparison and conversion inconsistency - need more info From: swhitemanlistens-software@cypressintegrated.com (Sanford Whiteman) > You don't have to think the current documentation is awful to find ways > of improving it. Sure, go for it! -- S.