Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:70079 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 12123 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2013 09:53:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 Nov 2013 09:53:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=swhitemanlistens-software@cypressintegrated.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=swhitemanlistens-software@cypressintegrated.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain cypressintegrated.com designates 173.1.104.101 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: swhitemanlistens-software@cypressintegrated.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 173.1.104.101 rproxy2-b-iv.figureone.com Windows 2000 SP2+, XP SP1 (seldom 98 4.10.2222) Received: from [173.1.104.101] ([173.1.104.101:65089] helo=rproxy2-b-iv.figureone.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D0/00-12065-FA75F725 for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 04:53:52 -0500 Received: from localhost ([216.220.114.66]) by rproxy2-b-iv.figureone.com (Brand New Heavy v1.0) with ASMTP id VUL02049 for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 01:53:49 -0800 Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 04:53:42 -0500 Reply-To: Sanford Whiteman X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <97776909.20131110045342@cypressintegrated.com> To: Yasuo Ohgaki In-Reply-To: References: <527DF228.1080108@sugarcrm.com> <416659913.20131110035553@cypressintegrated.com> <127298508.20131110042057@cypressintegrated.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Comparison and conversion inconsistency - need more info From: swhitemanlistens-software@cypressintegrated.com (Sanford Whiteman) > http://us2.php.net/min > Is it? > I should be missing some manual pages. The values are referred to as comparables, href'd to the comparison page. min() follows the rules on the linked page, plus the additional note about strings (which is not relevant to your objection). Do you want the comparison rules to be restated on every page that uses the rules? Sir Tim would not be proud. -- S.