Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:69782 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 69389 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2013 20:40:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Oct 2013 20:40:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=zeev@zend.com; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=zeev@zend.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com from 209.85.220.180 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: zeev@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.220.180 mail-vc0-f180.google.com Received: from [209.85.220.180] ([209.85.220.180:57807] helo=mail-vc0-f180.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 29/DC-10840-9B2E6625 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 16:40:25 -0400 Received: by mail-vc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id lc6so657504vcb.39 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:40:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :thread-index:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=Nln0+K6jKvXX4jT+AVuuJ0y3+Gv5R0I5dtmm7AQtF2M=; b=HF3lZ6m5Bhr05lS2qzH9zVYkAsmw1krp8uSOIBnSfzQsDAgEQQ0IMb2NKyNvaw+JGu 6ljTe9kXOmEeD+KicXPwArIY6FJZLtJ2d37g1ho/ZICztk+kk4lgv7RaNJpmQV21FhXS 3zdg/1VjpvuEr382Q+iDVAiyJLOlfuH+9ABLQh827aie066fRRBCn+ijkRHeHQvGVw4p U8Tl+ZerXPY+YzKNLNiDQL1zQIxnxODS+i37+uK5XG231kzuX4ZWSVfWLYv5jRCWe379 SnmqtV5lN5EpzH5pXvzwx6trSL6Yy0VWn1k+Xdp3Uko0E5Nnv77bWdxVTXYek3kYWsoD zGCw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkJ4Xbk9ETspK0FvufMNsp9AacwPNweNs4GpxF0UqMltrDriRnZymqvOR4WDP4zVNuXCXu90cUCh3L7sJ5ZT8cs1N3s7Gb/0jeSipCpg6KJENuCipE4nWkbp2nctbBiZb/AEbI4 X-Received: by 10.52.32.37 with SMTP id f5mr13435079vdi.17.1382474422204; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:40:22 -0700 (PDT) References: <228247caf0dc0352a6c3f313193ea46a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 thread-index: AQFvaGujTCjrUJqWLlaL8nRIMvNzrAJ2mnjmAunplY0BcR8p95qJbwCw Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 23:40:21 +0300 Message-ID: <82fa1346f70700781429dc174266e53a@mail.gmail.com> To: Bob Weinand , Developers List PHP Mailing Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Vote] Keywords as identifiers From: zeev@zend.com (Zeev Suraski) > > Thumbs up for the idea as well, but I don't think we can live with the > > implementation. BTW, that's a bit of a grey area but I think that > > even if an idea is accepted, if there's no reasonably clean > > implementation available for it, I don't think it can go in. > > > > Zeev > > As said, if anyone has a good idea how to improve the implementation, I'd > be happy to implement it. > > (I really can't imagine a better way...) I think the point that Derick is trying to make, and that I agree with - is that if there's no better way to implement it we shouldn't be implementing it at all. In other words, coming up with a clean implementation is a requirement before we can go ahead and introduce this feature into the language. I did not mean to imply you did a poor job implementing it, I don't presently have an idea of how to make it better. Zeev