Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:69657 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 28681 invoked from network); 17 Oct 2013 19:29:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Oct 2013 19:29:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.217.172 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.217.172 mail-lb0-f172.google.com Received: from [209.85.217.172] ([209.85.217.172:51522] helo=mail-lb0-f172.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 23/28-12663-89A30625 for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 15:29:29 -0400 Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id c11so1963496lbj.31 for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 12:29:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=+b4WBJ65mVMIrIzwJqwUpc33C75Cpw5HWuUe+mTLYkM=; b=yX5omgKJPxoDNCOk6x5eylyQgAL/+ii59bsnqrL9GHjLIgI5cxudu3AYTcovYgaOjG CvJRRVLzSbhMlPFXZ8mENhK5Phhc41OiFihtT4YKwgUHNND4XzquWexqnbsk55vTBzUD 9E3i8UT7Miu1RmEIXzUQfMhc4DK8iE9VLPOUtN2XAPKZMCQiCtYADDggkd6UPt+zxQbx AvLlIicMrroA9hYuY8+gDYa4Lx7DOHFIDQsNXkYkZFm+urb/t3EpPSs9U1pvMYG7cg49 2P1Mn+SJwWXRmJxasBw9d3EUEO2WcnG+BOniCaifclX2BvZ5st0fPBx2+YuHXQyVATqd 4Pew== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.72.229 with SMTP id g5mr8649612lbv.10.1382038165532; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 12:29:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.148.138 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 12:29:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <52602B7A.3080509@gmail.com> References: <525C631E.1050008@gmail.com> <1381853515.3980.195.camel@guybrush> <526002B4.9010808@gmail.com> <526022E1.1040406@gmail.com> <52602B7A.3080509@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 12:29:25 -0700 Message-ID: To: Rowan Collins Cc: PHP Internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Proposal to deprecate create_function() From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Rowan Collins wrote: > On 17/10/2013 18:52, Pierre Joye wrote: >>> >>> The only real difference I can see with create_function is that it is/was >>> >more widely used; is that your concern, or do you see a fundamental >>> >difference between the two situations? >> >> I do. create_function is used for many very valid use cases, safely, >> much more than /e ever was (and its security impact was much bigger). >> Deprecating it does not help us nor our users at this stage. > > > If create_function did not exist, would any of those use cases persuade you > that it should? Not with latest PHP releases, but that's the point: we try to keep BC. -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org