Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:6959 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 27340 invoked by uid 1010); 11 Jan 2004 01:13:06 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 27292 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2004 01:13:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp3.pp.htv.fi) (213.243.153.173) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 11 Jan 2004 01:13:05 -0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (cs181008.pp.htv.fi [213.243.181.8]) by smtp3.pp.htv.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id E903D27B187; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 03:13:04 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0B1D4nN023483; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 03:13:04 +0200 Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 03:13:04 +0200 (EET) Reply-To: Jani Taskinen To: GPHemsley@aol.com Cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <180.248cf843.2d30ff2f@aol.com> Message-ID: References: <180.248cf843.2d30ff2f@aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP4/PHP5 Apache Modules on Windows From: sniper@iki.fi (Jani Taskinen) IIRC, it does not work. And it will not work either. Only way to run both in same apache is to have other one run as CGI. --Jani On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 GPHemsley@aol.com wrote: >Again, I'm asking about running both PHP4 and PHP5 on Windows XP as Apache >modules. > >I asked this question a few months ago and was told it was a bad idea. But >now, it seems that the latest snapshot (RC1-dev, it seems) has the file >php5apache.dll. Can I safely set it up just as I did with PHP4? Will I need to do >something different? Can I do it at all? Thanks. > >Gordon Hemsley > >P.S. As I was in the middle of writing this e-mail, I remembered being told >that it would be better posted to php.general or php.windows (I think). Would >it be better to do that? The only reason I'm asking is because the only list >that I subscribe to is Internals, so it would be extra effort to do so. Thanks >again! >