Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:69532
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.52 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <52550CB7.5040309@php.net>
References: <ED.DC.24156.DB452525@pb1.pair.com>
	<CAF+90c_KbYKZP+KAj2Z8HFq+ceGO_17P3jk-FycjP1dBvHXjWA@mail.gmail.com>
	<525283A7.50303@php.net>
	<83.12.24156.54982525@pb1.pair.com>
	<CAPg3Xx+XAQi9b1mCwnK59hnykAAJyGj0BwyazcWzn3NXHiM4jw@mail.gmail.com>
	<52550CB7.5040309@php.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 13:22:54 +0200
Message-ID: <CAH-PCH5=kXweQM2VZ58EU_3ML2_qU8+gVLC=1HeJrZ-2vWmyfA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joe Watkins <krakjoe@php.net>
Cc: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>, Peter Cowburn <petercowburn@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5daca0413bde04e84d1ba4
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Vote: Anonymous Classes
From: tyra3l@gmail.com (Ferenc Kovacs)

--047d7b5daca0413bde04e84d1ba4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Joe Watkins <krakjoe@php.net> wrote:

> On 10/07/2013 11:20 AM, Peter Cowburn wrote:
>
>> On 7 October 2013 11:13, Joe Watkins <krakjoe@php.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Morning Chaps,
>>>
>>>          On the advice of many, I have restarted the vote, sorry for th=
e
>>> inconvenience/confusion ...
>>>
>>
>>
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/**anonymous_classes#voting<https://wiki.php.net=
/rfc/anonymous_classes#voting>(re-link, for the lazy)
>>
>> The voting options changed from choosing a version ("5.6", "5.7") or
>> rejecting=E2=80=A6 too a much simpler, yes/no for sticking this into mas=
ter.
>>  Which
>> branch/release the feature makes it into is something to be decided down
>> the line (ultimately, by the RMs).
>>
>>
>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Joe
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>  Morning All,
>
>         To anyone who has voted or will vote no; if you have voted no but
> is something that could be done to the patch to change your mind, please =
do
> speak up :)
>
>         If you voted/will vote no and there's nothing that can change you=
r
> mind, I'd still be interested in hearing the reasoning ...
>
>         This is a pretty quiet vote ... as this is the first RFC I have
> put forward, I'd like a bit more feedback so I can avoid the avoidable in
> the future ...
>
>
> Cheers
> Joe
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
I have voted no based on the lack of support for
serialization/unserialization, and I think that we agreed that without
somehow naming the class, we can't support that, and having a name would
defeat the purpose of this feature.

I'm looking forward to nested classes though.

--=20
Ferenc Kov=C3=A1cs
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu

--047d7b5daca0413bde04e84d1ba4--