Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:69490
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.50 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <525264E8.3050602@php.net>
References: <ED.DC.24156.DB452525@pb1.pair.com>
	<CAEZPtU5gHyMJXoS_+OJUn6tRLmRmTfqZMutOFJE-YJbA77x0ig@mail.gmail.com>
	<525264E8.3050602@php.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 09:48:35 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU5NwJmfDzV+z=ak-c5GUZ+j7eqAPQABX-LMXOODQVjTrw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joe Watkins <krakjoe@php.net>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Vote: Anonymous Classes
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Joe Watkins <krakjoe@php.net> wrote:

>         5.6 remains an option ...
>
>         I brought it up in IRC the other day and someone, I forget who, but
> recognized them at the time, said they'd rather see it in 5.7, then a few
> people joined in the discussion and I couldn't really argue with their
> reasoning.
>
>         The main point was that even a simple patch can have a destabilizing
> effect, and we've already merged several "simple" patches into 5.6.
>
>         I think it's a bit early to call time on 5.6 features,

It is not and we should begin soon to branch 5.6 and go with the
milestones planing to get it out in June.

>  and I think
> features like this require quite some time for adoption and should be out as
> quickly as possible ...

I agree.

Cheers,
-- 
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org