Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:69355 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 44412 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2013 15:59:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 26 Sep 2013 15:59:21 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.4.21.210 cpc22-asfd3-2-0-cust209.1-2.cable.virginmedia.com Received: from [80.4.21.210] ([80.4.21.210:18281] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A3/61-37010-8D954425 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 11:59:21 -0400 To: internals@lists.php.net,Pierre Joye Message-ID: <524459D5.8050604@php.net> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 16:59:17 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5243F19F.3060307@php.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Posted-By: 80.4.21.210 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Anonymous Classes From: krakjoe@php.net (Joe Watkins) On 09/26/2013 01:00 PM, Pierre Joye wrote: > On Sep 26, 2013 10:35 AM, "Joe Watkins" wrote: >> > >>> >> >> Thanks ... >> >> I have made many changes to the RFC and patch since the beginning of this > discussion ... >> >> It might be useful if you could all now go back to the RFC for another > read, point out anything I've left unclear at this point. > > I saw your changes :) I would add more use cases if possible, the more the > better. > > My feeling is that some does not see yet a good use case. It is a known > pattern is sometimes not a good enough argument. > > Cheers, > Ok, I included just about all the information on use cases that is obvious or has been discussed, so I think we got use cases covered now, right ?? See a good one yet ?? Cheers Joe