Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:69351
Return-Path: <pierre.php@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 20561 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2013 12:00:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 26 Sep 2013 12:00:41 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.51 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.51 mail-la0-f51.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.215.51] ([209.85.215.51:55639] helo=mail-la0-f51.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 28/DD-46303-8E124425 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 08:00:40 -0400
Received: by mail-la0-f51.google.com with SMTP id es20so835609lab.24
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 05:00:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=NeOx3xSOfm0esRK+Fuum30M9rh1oJ4EHnUm/JaO8nLw=;
        b=bs4jf77RZ2nsF2rab7d9fCZ3cVWAaDMP/WqcLdXl2tONZxjjCWmOvTCYxYhJT7bzaj
         ssr7ymAGj+P7sReErI0RWI+fmN9pixbbK6pVTN4bc3u6h91V9QZrLs7oZQvhhilHu7zy
         EzO1TT4lAvshTe43456sqgeyArpoVOeegW7ERhfqoJKqgQqs6EyBfYLblisTaLQmRJJ6
         vbHOQIK4RaZdg0ScGWd9tQRR6Z0b5fbU13NltPI9oSzKhpUn62FDtjHtHlvnEoCGKaEC
         KHdy8ga95EHqEzJhiHg5uF+hn/TNga3Rl5t5bVpX+N9gTOuMTz5LLxHAdIQ2Mn+Lx9MW
         YU/Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.168.35 with SMTP id zt3mr3613965lbb.11.1380196836134;
 Thu, 26 Sep 2013 05:00:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.148.138 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 05:00:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.148.138 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 05:00:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5243F19F.3060307@php.net>
References: <D9.10.12097.032EF325@pb1.pair.com>
	<CAEZPtU7zzn+-Mon-kWP++xYUCEj+0gOk4pp9vEFmTU9-X6NJoA@mail.gmail.com>
	<5243F19F.3060307@php.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 05:00:36 -0700
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU6-YXWQu5G5wa1SCDtmCnNpnEF+N1_RihwFx5Yegz-qiA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joe Watkins <krakjoe@php.net>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c34b482353b804e7481e8e
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Anonymous Classes
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

--001a11c34b482353b804e7481e8e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Sep 26, 2013 10:35 AM, "Joe Watkins" <krakjoe@php.net> wrote:
>

>>
>
> Thanks ...
>
> I have made many changes to the RFC and patch since the beginning of this
discussion ...
>
> It might be useful if you could all now go back to the RFC for another
read, point out anything I've left unclear at this point.

I saw your changes :) I would add more use cases if possible, the more the
better.

My feeling is that some does not see yet a good use case. It is a known
pattern is sometimes not a good enough argument.

Cheers,

--001a11c34b482353b804e7481e8e--