Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:69342 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 98879 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2013 08:35:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 26 Sep 2013 08:35:15 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.4.21.210 cpc22-asfd3-2-0-cust209.1-2.cable.virginmedia.com Received: from [80.4.21.210] ([80.4.21.210:9335] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 59/89-46303-2C1F3425 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 04:35:14 -0400 To: internals@lists.php.net,Pierre Joye Message-ID: <5243F19F.3060307@php.net> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:34:39 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Posted-By: 80.4.21.210 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Anonymous Classes From: krakjoe@php.net (Joe Watkins) On 09/26/2013 01:50 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: > hi! > > On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Joe Watkins wrote: >> Morning All, >> >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/anonymous_classes >> >> I'd like to hear thoughts regarding the addition of anonymous classes, >> patch included. > > Thanks for your proposal and work. > > If you did not yet update your RFC I would suggest to do so, it is about > the right time. > > Adding already answered questions, more use cases (read a couple of good > ones in this thread). It will help to end in circular discussions or > arguing. > > Cheers, > Pierre > Thanks ... I have made many changes to the RFC and patch since the beginning of this discussion ... It might be useful if you could all now go back to the RFC for another read, point out anything I've left unclear at this point. Cheers Joe