Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:69265
Return-Path: <mike.php.net@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 96948 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2013 09:03:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 23 Sep 2013 09:03:51 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=mike.php.net@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=mike.php.net@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: mike.php.net@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.48 mail-la0-f48.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.215.48] ([209.85.215.48:51210] helo=mail-la0-f48.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 36/00-30351-5F300425 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 05:03:50 -0400
Received: by mail-la0-f48.google.com with SMTP id er20so2247317lab.35
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 02:03:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
         :from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=Ku2zPK7da0j+mAuy6SWkKFQ7ZyVqq9rEGokOyaqBozo=;
        b=nJpOY/o55Ae2GmENZ/s20wuPuucQe5Yu9PrUFiWz38LLtS80s+gPcIG51XB8nc69lK
         WFlbi7WokfnPEhtLcH0Oin9+2zqtmZzWvhpdNjrigdWuMKxx7qxbc76nX/FRcH/3EhYR
         yuqIcEp48Gao+Tk5DvIuthlZft4JEQ873M1nCgNI+Yr8YcWxoe6u/nTL7hqqvKXRAnRz
         VmZQNufMhXaKaR3LCr2lVMod0DBQDvMNl6y9uG+s6DNICHHrsDtwe3v+BUYRKC7V1+si
         dAKn1VLuLjkiE7taW5+NRuU16kWeE3uL84YnhOD8sMP3L4hAj2nanQu/v1VbX0RzeN8t
         UV/A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.64.36 with SMTP id l4mr18821666lbs.15.1379927027122;
 Mon, 23 Sep 2013 02:03:47 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: mike.php.net@gmail.com
Received: by 10.114.184.19 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 02:03:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALJZF3hRmc3_jS==WT+8_MDymGQmKpWJ5vTLUaAnTU71okzgCw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <D9.10.12097.032EF325@pb1.pair.com>
	<523FFE44.8030107@lerdorf.com>
	<CALJZF3hRmc3_jS==WT+8_MDymGQmKpWJ5vTLUaAnTU71okzgCw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 11:03:47 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2ebdwvKXjsr68OVbd80WEMWvnkA
Message-ID: <CALJZF3j6ekHLBaW4U4jsw9T1GkKWrvap4VhDkv=E9pET=M=Rig@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.com>
Cc: Joe Watkins <krakjoe@php.net>, PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Anonymous Classes
From: mike@php.net (Michael Wallner)

On 23 September 2013 11:00, Michael Wallner <mike@php.net> wrote:
> On 23 September 2013 10:39, Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.com> wrote:
>> On 09/22/2013 11:39 PM, Joe Watkins wrote:
>>>     https://wiki.php.net/rfc/anonymous_classes
>>>
>>>     I'd like to hear thoughts regarding the addition of anonymous
>>> classes, patch included.
>>
>> I am having a hard time picturing a real-world use-case for this.
>
> It is a widely used pattern in object oriented programming:

... where you code against interfaces (was supposed to follow that words :))

Sorry.

-- 
Regards,
Mike