Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:69214
Return-Path: <leight@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 37044 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2013 19:57:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 18 Sep 2013 19:57:31 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=leight@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=leight@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.52 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: leight@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.52 mail-wg0-f52.google.com  
Received: from [74.125.82.52] ([74.125.82.52:45587] helo=mail-wg0-f52.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 54/81-29009-AA50A325 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 15:57:30 -0400
Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id m15so7050866wgh.19
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 12:57:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=qj+zCx6rW9Imo34bQCNTwEe7DQsC+n+1DiiC4191MWA=;
        b=g7uhl6O5qExVwaoK4hoiXiVBL1/WEWihgOJzlLxxVJL19TfIkOlUNCoweRI16Pj5f4
         NnjQcxoefapalyUPuKI4OVjs57pZTpmsfUYW1JS0fwdlJgHYqcy3+vZY/E+rWwB0caE8
         FdZO4PymjVqk6Zb+p0dt2BM9e9pO93Lgx/1lIRFXR+v1wI8puQcpjVcvXlLnDad477Lg
         eTlk36BdGl4CUV9nS0B59+bqBZFAC6GPqc5asd2mOA5FpC1SFN91CLbnPanWQcIzVVbB
         2GFAPg3gfjBbkC2E9QEYtcG4F/MuokSHudsIx2odmipQRgojK8pDa0I711vwhzSaNNSi
         PVBA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.181.11.163 with SMTP id ej3mr8447883wid.47.1379534247346;
 Wed, 18 Sep 2013 12:57:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.184.3 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 12:57:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BLU0-SMTP4653FE63F45B66EB7C33532E2200@phx.gbl>
References: <CAPwsocGni4kjJq9c5wr77ohPU+YX2=0O7EgahdH=p0=hH1H_fA@mail.gmail.com>
	<49D57F66323040FC9AE48244DAAF3771@gmail.com>
	<012B9378-3C3A-4169-96D3-3B57D6C7A82C@seancoates.com>
	<CAAjMSDNwmpFRpX4VTj-AoUYp2PWXioyQRE3o8eCvb8VzXsB9Hw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACwt+JcwJQB6b8JpJAp6g67NKgUr9ebMRbGKH=aHLX7wk+2Rxw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPwsocGm4s_rPWg3UuJvz3=d7qBwZxLZVXe7rdm-_mua=UfyfA@mail.gmail.com>
	<BLU0-SMTP4653FE63F45B66EB7C33532E2200@phx.gbl>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 20:57:27 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPwsocERwgXv4K0ROsPOSSrtDjqgbDwFuoT80=eeVZsW7-38jA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bob Weinand <bobwei9@hotmail.com>
Cc: Developers List PHP Mailing <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Allowing is_* functions to accept multiple parameters
From: leight@gmail.com (Leigh)

On 18 September 2013 18:50, Bob Weinand <bobwei9@hotmail.com> wrote:
> At least, from a technical point, evaluating LTR would require to change the engine
> (would be some more complex change as it would require to switch between contexts
> and being able to execute the ZEND_SEND_VAL opcodes one by one

Feels like you're overthinking it?

Plan was to allow any is_* function to be called as normal (SEND_VAR,
SEND_VAR ... FCALL), then iterate over the supplied arguments inside
the function and return false at the first failure, emulating the
boolean short circuit.