Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:69210 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 27181 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2013 18:49:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Sep 2013 18:49:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=dor.tchizik@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=dor.tchizik@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.214.179 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: dor.tchizik@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.179 mail-ob0-f179.google.com Received: from [209.85.214.179] ([209.85.214.179:59119] helo=mail-ob0-f179.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 12/05-01324-5A5F9325 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 14:49:09 -0400 Received: by mail-ob0-f179.google.com with SMTP id wn1so7904578obc.38 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 11:49:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=eiSd4X2oAvr1Mgoa98lVjZsjq7lM8nzB6b6AJ0PfbRI=; b=RAl60wLU9KQTCG6bSP/zcCXiDLZwu9BeaPC2KBRNrz1a3N0PQ3abNKCsBKNiqjgEZP S5BSVJcYurAMYXmjkB2FSh2+A/xaxScH4tgDTr8FN+IZ+jLfAtjsHP3ZnOiP0uQMNDrU Mbl8kJCSmkcN+B9TbzWSkvCgrfnMLSKPAXLpaJMZNc23LH4Xssg9S3yoPOswRrnHLNqi UNgWa9nJ+o1Q8FC1PNu0wCHLad7ziCntsQIzsvYixQmSuQH2IwK801iW+bJ7Ja3tANPE zM2GKv9S1XZYyivCxwa1as6beXHQpaw3vir7QqXoImAAyuLKye77MAM5Te7UEg/zz96w /zhw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.80.8 with SMTP id n8mr9829oex.33.1379530146735; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 11:49:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.39.137 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 11:49:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130918182518.GA12594@analysisandsolutions.com> References: <20130917142758.GA26444@analysisandsolutions.com> <20130918175345.GA12155@analysisandsolutions.com> <20130918182518.GA12594@analysisandsolutions.com> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 20:49:06 +0200 Message-ID: To: Daniel Convissor Cc: Bob Weinand , Developers PHP Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Support for keywords where possible From: dor.tchizik@gmail.com (Madara Uchiha) > > Hi Bob: > > > Well, that makes no sense. Then you just could say no to all new > > language changes. Because it cannot be run on older versions. > > Allow me one last post to clarify. What I said is the cost in _this_ > case doesn't outweigh the advantages. > > As someone who writes a lot of open source (and proprietary) code that > gets run on machines that I have no control over, implementing this > proposal will complicate my life. Every time I make a function I'll > have to ask myself "is this a reserved word in older versions of PHP?" > > I'll leave the discussion at that. > > Thanks, > > --Dan Really? Really?! If you don't want to use (un)reserved keywords, just don't, regardless of if it's allowed in PHPX and not in PHPY, why do you care if it's implemented for those who do want it available?