Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:69201
Return-Path: <patrick.allaert@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 4364 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2013 14:54:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 18 Sep 2013 14:54:56 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=patrick.allaert@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=patrick.allaert@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.83.49 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: patrick.allaert@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.83.49 mail-ee0-f49.google.com  
Received: from [74.125.83.49] ([74.125.83.49:62717] helo=mail-ee0-f49.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id B1/B0-01324-FBEB9325 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 10:54:56 -0400
Received: by mail-ee0-f49.google.com with SMTP id d41so3445233eek.8
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 07:54:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
         :from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=ULWxlY7/N7nAwLxWXjtfs4L0FbParip0kC1Axa3p+Ys=;
        b=ct2z0fOJU+M/d9LSDvd2gdFtY3yMVtGywZORrasPQNzwubXy/HEILyoRtQ8rEQGDJB
         Fga9oi/WV5tm7fse/X5LdZWJjf7xvbouVuYDsZo+HYYG4nKID6vtTttr1W1UNX3q9lGB
         6HcrysOUnJhBZYKPU0DGfU2SagHx9thR7VP9Qqk5Hf1lzpfdBARc0SpLTC9ZXxRlkpwE
         OKr7W+4B2BSN7XvR778HbD+v2BwvQ/9nmw/K9kYx5HBOzasLv586t6IaC9pzV61eAtmK
         +h5s8k+oY/O5Cw1kFmMcPFezD52Xba5RwbT5m5kMViTrXVTTTNvNTRaNt/SZBdPSrcYN
         YG9w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.14.127.137 with SMTP id d9mr1918762eei.90.1379516093200;
 Wed, 18 Sep 2013 07:54:53 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: patrick.allaert@gmail.com
Received: by 10.14.144.66 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 07:54:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <FCD3CB35-0B25-40B9-8D08-49636F03B869@seancoates.com>
References: <CAPwsocGni4kjJq9c5wr77ohPU+YX2=0O7EgahdH=p0=hH1H_fA@mail.gmail.com>
	<49D57F66323040FC9AE48244DAAF3771@gmail.com>
	<012B9378-3C3A-4169-96D3-3B57D6C7A82C@seancoates.com>
	<CACwt+JfgRYZURX=NE7HQ7p51RHgsKGKyTZBZe2jTvtZLeFa8WQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<FCD3CB35-0B25-40B9-8D08-49636F03B869@seancoates.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:54:53 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: bnVRO6gLpXaVTt5WF-JsMe-CgTI
Message-ID: <CACwt+JdieS78AwivsoeGKOBZ3XcRwk+2GVCTj1fLdoT06hLJSA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sean Coates <sean@seancoates.com>
Cc: Leigh <leight@gmail.com>, PHP Development <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Allowing is_* functions to accept multiple parameters
From: patrickallaert@php.net (Patrick ALLAERT)

2013/9/18 Sean Coates <sean@seancoates.com>:
>> Not a good idea IMHO: it would complexify the execution a lot, think about:
>
> To be clear, I wasn't proposing an alternative. I was just pointing out that function call semantics are not the same as conditional (short-circuit) semantics, as they appeared in the OP.

That is true! Something to take in mind for the documentation if this
is going to be implemented!