Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:69199
Return-Path: <sean@seancoates.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 1518 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2013 14:52:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 18 Sep 2013 14:52:34 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=sean@seancoates.com; sender-id=unknown
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=sean@seancoates.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain seancoates.com from 64.15.79.181 cause and error)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: sean@seancoates.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 64.15.79.181 iconoclast.caedmon.net  
Received: from [64.15.79.181] ([64.15.79.181:35248] helo=iconoclast.caedmon.net)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 56/00-01324-13EB9325 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 10:52:34 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by iconoclast.caedmon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 106003260E8;
	Wed, 18 Sep 2013 10:52:30 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at iconoclast.caedmon.net
Received: from iconoclast.caedmon.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (iconoclast.caedmon.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 6uMP2syVdhnx; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 10:52:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [10.8.0.2] (sarcasm.vpn [10.8.0.2])
	by iconoclast.caedmon.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34AB73260DB;
	Wed, 18 Sep 2013 10:52:27 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
In-Reply-To: <CACwt+JfgRYZURX=NE7HQ7p51RHgsKGKyTZBZe2jTvtZLeFa8WQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 10:52:25 -0400
Cc: Leigh <leight@gmail.com>,
 PHP Development <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <FCD3CB35-0B25-40B9-8D08-49636F03B869@seancoates.com>
References: <CAPwsocGni4kjJq9c5wr77ohPU+YX2=0O7EgahdH=p0=hH1H_fA@mail.gmail.com> <49D57F66323040FC9AE48244DAAF3771@gmail.com> <012B9378-3C3A-4169-96D3-3B57D6C7A82C@seancoates.com> <CACwt+JfgRYZURX=NE7HQ7p51RHgsKGKyTZBZe2jTvtZLeFa8WQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Patrick ALLAERT <patrickallaert@php.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Allowing is_* functions to accept multiple parameters
From: sean@seancoates.com (Sean Coates)

> Not a good idea IMHO: it would complexify the execution a lot, think =
about:

To be clear, I wasn't proposing an alternative. I was just pointing out =
that function call semantics are not the same as conditional =
(short-circuit) semantics, as they appeared in the OP.

S