Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:69150
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: softfail (pb1.pair.com: domain golemon.com does not designate 209.85.220.52 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: php@golemon.com
In-Reply-To: <CAF+90c-8fMSnTCs_s06zmRAFirRe9OLHTmGF8f0Xq2t6u_dWfg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAF+90c8oxd4j4sj6AL+TdYu6_AoroWk1=RPdKrE7PNBs2XZg=A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAF+90c-8fMSnTCs_s06zmRAFirRe9OLHTmGF8f0Xq2t6u_dWfg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 12:02:52 -0700
Message-ID: <CAESVnVp3MkaQbQLi2+0YPeguuF_BiMOtnYacfc5Pn+rYEUquYg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b33c72ee1111f04e684d9dc
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] Syntax for variadic functions
From: pollita@php.net (Sara Golemon)

--047d7b33c72ee1111f04e684d9dc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

>
>
> I'd like to go forward with voting on this. Are there any issues that still
> need to be resolved?
>
> Assuming the RFC as-is represents the current state, I'm +1 on all of it.

I'm not a fan of some of the proposed alterations which would translate
arrays (a la call_user_func_array()).  To clarify, the following output is
what I'd expect:
function f(...$args) {
  echo count($args);
}
f(1,2,3); // 3
f([1,2,3]); // 1

Not "3" in both cases.

-Sara

--047d7b33c72ee1111f04e684d9dc--