Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:69084 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 11214 invoked from network); 12 Sep 2013 07:27:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Sep 2013 07:27:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ml@anderiasch.de; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ml@anderiasch.de; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain anderiasch.de from 81.169.138.148 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ml@anderiasch.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 81.169.138.148 ares.art-core.org Received: from [81.169.138.148] ([81.169.138.148:47962] helo=mail.anderiasch.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id CB/C5-12981-5EC61325 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 03:27:33 -0400 Message-ID: <52316CCB.7010902@anderiasch.de> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 09:27:07 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130704 Icedove/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Philip Sturgeon CC: "internals@lists.php.net" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Wake up From: ml@anderiasch.de (Florian Anderiasch) On 09/12/2013 06:43 AM, Philip Sturgeon wrote: > As for the comments about the FIG made by others, I agree with Larry > in that we're doing a pretty good job at trying to build on the > example set forward by internals. Self moderation and workflow are two > important factors to the group, and I don't feel like this 4 point > list is the sort of workflow anyone should be trying to follow or > enforce. I'm not sure I'm getting what you're trying to say here: If it only is about the workflow in FIG, ok, maybe that should be looked at and put out more descriptively on this list instead of people telling to go read something somewhere. If it is about what FIG does, then I disagree - because while I love what FIG has been come up with (in terms of contents partly and of it being done at all fully) - I think it has no place in internals and is very well off as a seperate entity. Like I find a coding standard set by the language developers kind of nuts. (Go pun not intended, because in Go it has been there from the public beta version, not introduced like 15 years after inception. Same with Python, afaik it was a PEP that was basically accepted by the community at large) Greetings, Florian