Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:68987 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 18338 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2013 23:01:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Sep 2013 23:01:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 217.147.176.204 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.147.176.204 mail4.serversure.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [217.147.176.204] ([217.147.176.204:49909] helo=mail4.serversure.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id B0/01-03199-F335E225 for ; Mon, 09 Sep 2013 19:01:20 -0400 Received: (qmail 7247 invoked by uid 89); 9 Sep 2013 23:01:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO linux-dev4.lsces.org.uk) (lester@rainbowdigitalmedia.org.uk@86.186.52.223) by mail4.serversure.net with ESMTPA; 9 Sep 2013 23:01:16 -0000 Message-ID: <522E5434.3000205@lsces.co.uk> Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 00:05:24 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:23.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/23.0 SeaMonkey/2.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PHP internals References: <52244E82.1070500@cubiclesoft.com> <522DF56C.3070602@lsces.co.uk> <522E0E33.7060906@lsces.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] When will 5.2 binaries be retired from windows.php.net? From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) Pierre Joye wrote: > On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 8:06 PM, Lester Caine wrote: > >> Pierre ... all I am saying is that the reference to 'older VC6 versions' in >> the left hand column would benefit from a 'which are only available in the >> museum', although I would suggest it may be better simply to say 'no longer >> supported'. > > > I do not think it would benefit anyone to promote VC6, in any form :) Exactly > The only note we keep there is about using apache.org's binaries: > > "If you are using PHP with Apache 1 or Apache2 fromapache.org (not > recommended) you need to use the older VC6 versions of PHP compiled > with the legacy Visual Studio 6 compiler. Do NOT use VC9+ versions of > PHP with the apache.org binaries." Which is why I said 'no longer supported' so an extra line "This is no longer supported." Would just clarify the situation rather than it's current suggestion that you SHOULD use the VC6 versions ... -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk