Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:68873 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 18231 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2013 22:11:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Sep 2013 22:11:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=krebs.seb@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=krebs.seb@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.212.172 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: krebs.seb@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.212.172 mail-wi0-f172.google.com Received: from [209.85.212.172] ([209.85.212.172:40037] helo=mail-wi0-f172.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id B3/F0-29856-90D05225 for ; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 18:11:21 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id c10so2553345wiw.11 for ; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 15:11:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=+jb1I3oEVxQRYYItvecyT/l2J9hXYmRpKRLVbuaTtes=; b=jaHU4nCNh/yNo/qVDsXCzXe0cYNETElqWSxJ7/nN9fRD1WgnaDiufvvz3mFkqZQFYx ZWwwNQVJRS2yKJvRRUNp3e/nc8f6WBbgjr0pDgZcj5MLk1lN6irSn2wBy9m45orzmml7 o4VW9etL4rW+7XziLDTj0ZcbgiwD5/8FKI6TAjb5N35QmEESdPwYwLav81Tatf91e9rY EWwBg20duEAzYfoinw6v2q/z///QL3cwgen4Bvp0Ye9nLs7gZ1Zr7u3oPC+0iBn7d6wh 3aMKeT3pLjPqFq0FxdsSNeoBBcDsUUKOy4IjnxIakLY8toRPQaJqgijURr+J6rngT8qD AEDA== X-Received: by 10.194.134.97 with SMTP id pj1mr25290wjb.58.1378159878738; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 15:11:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.5.9 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 15:10:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <52250477.2060803@sugarcrm.com> References: <52243BA6.5040905@sugarcrm.com> <5224F0FB.9080506@sugarcrm.com> <005a01cea821$7f0a9470$7d1fbd50$@tutteli.ch> <52250477.2060803@sugarcrm.com> Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 00:10:38 +0200 Message-ID: To: Stas Malyshev Cc: Robert Stoll , Nikita Popov , PHP Internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01228058041ae404e56dda89 Subject: Re: AW: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Skipping parameters take 2 From: krebs.seb@gmail.com (Sebastian Krebs) --089e01228058041ae404e56dda89 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 2013/9/2 Stas Malyshev > Hi! > > > I would not agree with your argument that it should be introduced > because it > > is requested by real people for years and it is simple to add. Isn't that > > pretty much the same as "because we can"? > > No, it is pretty much the opposite. It is "because people need it". > I am a user and I don't need it and named parameters makes it obsolete anyway. Now it would be interesting, if "people" would "need" named parameters less, than the ability to pass "default" instead of "null" (or whatever).... > > > IMO we should wait with this RFC if Nikita is willing to write an RFC for > > named parameters including an implementation afterwards, because I think > > We've been talking about it for years (last time here: > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/namedparameters) but nothing happened. But I'm > certainly willing to give it a chance, if it is happening. I just not > want for all the effort to be wasted if it's not and we'd be left > without a solution for a real problem again. > -- > Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect > SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ > (408)454-6900 ext. 227 > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- github.com/KingCrunch --089e01228058041ae404e56dda89--