Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:68864 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 2699 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2013 20:48:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Sep 2013 20:48:04 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=morrison.levi@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=morrison.levi@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.214.174 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: morrison.levi@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.174 mail-ob0-f174.google.com Received: from [209.85.214.174] ([209.85.214.174:48772] helo=mail-ob0-f174.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 11/BD-29856-289F4225 for ; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 16:48:03 -0400 Received: by mail-ob0-f174.google.com with SMTP id wd6so4966682obb.33 for ; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 13:48:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=+epWYYMJsrmjnMLzWgrBL3Ry2ZmS/Xm/VaV4x1XbFR0=; b=OQVXUAhHYWSWDNYQVIaaRwt/TA0yE+NzuxAbtTRueSp0DSIGA3ZI8WdrDpWCUwCbaf nzFi3476osrxFCD9LZGqwvl194DfvnW02qbUpJRYyhGNRUwX/bS64+F+Q/qM4bodg5dO w7zF0koJeoyakmoHNnVCQvN/erRm8whuNMICx3dAFoeu88ShB/AeGt+VLbKgNGM5EA4d qQQfNlBtzgNZA5po4IKUXHVvo/sqnDFFSfQFxj7iO1Dsb6WD3EIA+ZWVIaq6S9z9CYP/ 5XzX/vBm1HWDhHyKU2n1YKg8Am3r9KVpBTQbDiIWSoYJSJkYdBER8DdYC+ypYlgXjVHu 4LAQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.145.241 with SMTP id sx17mr2588298oeb.57.1378154879943; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 13:47:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.122.200 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 13:47:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5224F0FB.9080506@sugarcrm.com> References: <52243BA6.5040905@sugarcrm.com> <5224F0FB.9080506@sugarcrm.com> Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 14:47:59 -0600 Message-ID: To: Stas Malyshev Cc: Nikita Popov , PHP Internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d474a108f8204e56cb074 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Skipping parameters take 2 From: morrison.levi@gmail.com (Levi Morrison) --047d7b5d474a108f8204e56cb074 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote: > Hi! > > > I think this doesn't really help readability. Right now you should > > implement functions with many options with an $options array. > > I don't understand. Who says I should do that? I certainly don't see how > I should. > > > If we want to change something here, we should skip this step and go > > right for named arguments. I think I'll give implementing them a try. > > If you are ready to present named args proposal for 5.6, fine. But if > not, I think denying obviously requested feature (see links for requests > in the RFC) because some "pie in the sky" consideration is completely > wrong. > > I must say it seems a little strange for me given current stream of > "because we can" syntax additions proposed to reject something that has > been asked for by real people for years just because sometime in the > future we might or might not have something that may do a similar thing > in different way. > -- > Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect > SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ > (408)454-6900 ext. 227 > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > --047d7b5d474a108f8204e56cb074--