Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:68634 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 79409 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2013 11:49:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Aug 2013 11:49:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=johannes@schlueters.de; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=johannes@schlueters.de; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain schlueters.de from 217.114.215.10 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: johannes@schlueters.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.114.215.10 mail.experimentalworks.net Received: from [217.114.215.10] ([217.114.215.10:36291] helo=mail.experimentalworks.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 37/20-12893-1C3ED125 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 07:49:23 -0400 Received: from [192.168.2.20] (ppp-93-104-28-137.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.28.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: johannes@schlueters.de) by mail.experimentalworks.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 53A5842801; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 13:49:21 +0200 (CEST) To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ond=C5=99ej_Sur=C3=BD?= Cc: PHP Internals In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 13:49:18 +0200 Message-ID: <1377690558.2929.87.camel@guybrush> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Attitude against distributions... (Was: JSON non-free license) From: johannes@schlueters.de (Johannes =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Schl=FCter?=) On Wed, 2013-08-28 at 08:55 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to react on Stat's "it's-not-our-problem" comment in > https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63520 I see Stas' reply as respond to Jordi (seld on php.net). We can discuss what *we* *will* do, but for arguing about Debian/Ubuntu *current* packaging decisions it is the wrong place. This has to be discussed in those communities. Those topics are related but still separate topics, decided by different groups. johannes