Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:686 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 21530 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2003 17:14:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jdi.jdimedia.nl) (212.204.192.51) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 4 Apr 2003 17:14:08 -0000 Received: from jdi.jdimedia.nl (jdi.jdimedia.nl [212.204.192.51]) by jdi.jdimedia.nl (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id h34HE6nv027207; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 19:14:06 +0200 Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 19:14:06 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: derick@jdi.jdimedia.nl To: Per Lundberg cc: PHP Internals In-Reply-To: <1049475676.28232.615.camel@salem.intra.nobolt.net> Message-ID: References: <20030404145236.GA32691@hyperion.gravitonic.com> <1049469044.6067.1.camel@hasele> <20030404160719.GB1558@hyperion.gravitonic.com> <1049475676.28232.615.camel@salem.intra.nobolt.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Static and non-static methods From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Per Lundberg wrote: > On Fri, 2003-04-04 at 18:07, Andrei Zmievski wrote: > > On Fri, 04 Apr 2003, Derick Rethans wrote: > > > > Well its a BC nightmare, and I don't really see any big advantage. > > > Agreed, breaking BC for this sounds like a bad idea to me. > > sometimes I just hate BC.. > > Why only sometimes? > > Besides, it is much a matter of asking yourself: what is most important, > being compatible with old PHP ugly-OO code or compatibility with other > OO-languages such as C++ and Java? > > I know what I would answer to that question. :-) Yes, "being compatible" Derick -- "my other box is your windows PC" ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl/ PHP Magazine - PHP Magazine for Professionals http://php-mag.net/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------