Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:68526
Return-Path: <marcello.duarte@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 11903 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2013 13:12:06 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 15 Aug 2013 13:12:06 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=marcello.duarte@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=marcello.duarte@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.212.178 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: marcello.duarte@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.212.178 mail-wi0-f178.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.212.178] ([209.85.212.178:46212] helo=mail-wi0-f178.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 0E/21-06453-5A3DC025 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:12:06 -0400
Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id j17so3078785wiw.5
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 06:12:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
         :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
        bh=WMNdeqxFb62ltR4DeQMdl0xwfFA8TxUKghU5HqI4Zjk=;
        b=J1Qaiyvi9cz0cwOgHS3ObyaIknV66Fe/dARgYd/1IXlugIIEDcwKukG4Z2sLHiifN/
         mIk40Q8He/D6y4VLPDuqkrBbDI5nUIlbKF5gjH+4gs5rTx4nwGcQxxXgBQk37AHR6Sb7
         7FEFcEMT4UxrvzFaT52oEWMtRcx0OKIn2M1PXIO5Sm80id/X9bZT8XHJryFjacxFsYRQ
         +0UiS2huK62VDFxZhwey64zg1MdWW+/mIHytfHDCj8LyAsCe8Vnb0rz4sE8bzoRJNoyb
         DlJS1aGEIJbJ2oSm3gz4BLo3/OsYbM0UX9531Fi+GsCJUo9a1HJHsAsRtDNst0k8ggPy
         PybQ==
X-Received: by 10.180.11.233 with SMTP id t9mr1801566wib.41.1376572322936;
        Thu, 15 Aug 2013 06:12:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.15] (cpc9-finc13-2-0-cust191.4-2.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.1.84.192])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id hb2sm2836471wib.0.1969.12.31.16.00.00
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Thu, 15 Aug 2013 06:12:01 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <F3518317-D170-4BF7-8D91-E7E636F1FA73@wiedler.ch>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 14:11:59 +0100
Cc: Daniel Bingham <daniel.bingham@ellislab.com>,
 Michael Wallner <mike@php.net>,
 "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <C8EC12C4-90E9-486A-8ABE-0A83AA428B8A@gmail.com>
References: <60BF8DD5-FEEA-47D9-834F-6C7FDEF3B879@wiedler.ch> <6644FE5E-4CBA-4A08-8766-8634CAA4426D@wiedler.ch> <CALJZF3hQm7QgVPc+77=tTHBCiKxJYQGJ1FHpY1jkLtVQ_p5zKA@mail.gmail.com> <CAG2oV=_4RWaM_+wy3b99ZW=HTjug5hfE-CrB-Tqbkr7oz2y0kQ@mail.gmail.com> <F3518317-D170-4BF7-8D91-E7E636F1FA73@wiedler.ch>
To: Igor Wiedler <igor@wiedler.ch>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Importing namespaced functions
From: marcello.duarte@gmail.com (Marcello Duarte)

Hi,

Are there any thoughts regarding importing multiple functions of a =
namespace with a wildcard?

A use case being, for example, assertions from a testing framework.

use (or use function) TestingFramework\Assertions\<chosen wildcard =
here>; // in java * is used for wildcard

Regards,
Marcello

On 15 Aug 2013, at 14:06, Igor Wiedler wrote:

> Hi Daniel,
>=20
> Thanks for the suggestion. Since it is less straight-forward I would =
rather just move forward with the current syntax. I'd hate to see the =
proposal rejected because people did not like the syntax.
>=20
> Regards,
>=20
> Igor
>=20
> On Aug 8, 2013, at 10:30 PM, Daniel Bingham =
<daniel.bingham@ellislab.com> wrote:
>=20
>> Hey Igor,
>>=20
>> I love the RFC, but how about:
>>=20
>> use bar\baz() as baz;
>>=20
>> As an alternative to "use function".  Still new syntax, but a little =
less wordy.  I have nothing for "use const", but "use const" feels more =
natural to me than "use function" does.
>>=20
>> Just an idea for pondering!
>>=20
>> Dan
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Michael Wallner <mike@php.net> wrote:
>> On 8 August 2013 14:29, Igor Wiedler <igor@wiedler.ch> wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>=20
>>> I just wanted to bump this topic, since there's not been much =
feedback during the last few weeks. Comments on the patch are also =
welcome.
>>>=20
>>> RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/use_function
>>> Patch: https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/388
>>>=20
>>=20
>> I like it. It improves the state for non-OOP in PHP.
>>=20
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Mike
>>=20
>> --
>> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>>=20
>>=20
>=20
>=20
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>=20