Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:68507 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 10232 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2013 09:01:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Aug 2013 09:01:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 108.166.43.83 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 108.166.43.83 smtp83.ord1c.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [108.166.43.83] ([108.166.43.83:36381] helo=smtp83.ord1c.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 36/21-06453-6774B025 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 05:01:42 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 3E6D8506F0; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 05:01:40 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp3.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 470AC506CA; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 05:01:39 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <520B4772.8090701@sugarcrm.com> Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 02:01:38 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julien Pauli CC: Anthony Ferrara , "internals@lists.php.net" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Constant Scalar Expressions From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/const_scalar_expressions I like the idea, but absence of constant support makes this thing much less useful, as you can't do things like: public $angle = M_PI/2; I think this is one of the reasons this idea was never implemented - because without constant support you're limited to doing things that are quite obvious and trivial. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227