Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:68444
Return-Path: <leight@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 22995 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2013 15:16:35 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 8 Aug 2013 15:16:35 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=leight@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=leight@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.173 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: leight@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.173 mail-we0-f173.google.com  
Received: from [74.125.82.173] ([74.125.82.173:41016] helo=mail-we0-f173.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 25/F5-06453-356B3025 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 11:16:35 -0400
Received: by mail-we0-f173.google.com with SMTP id x55so2643210wes.18
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 08:16:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=pTh2WWXOnbJi3WXU+ZTdN6Ok/0WlLTsB+AHd4Lp3CfE=;
        b=TLFHuYtyFC9dWjCJO43hqrMaLarDvs+joSc2/y5lRSCtUyWy20ubchuwnmRshfxLQV
         1hWbBHcp9AmKSims/JBBQMJEoF/7hR02sMZ9BvibdoWpnJbZ5EzUGHDmgceYB4H7gsjy
         s/LeHDcoti4aJlPEawvtAOuM+dhHZoP+yWDiqsLUQqsUcu3ywMHIp0eCSiTEriPxWTrT
         1qJYRZzyjO1c19eMz8MT4vgtBWbParVRPdDTst8ZAji628g4gcK/exQjbjQoGBpzLRlu
         p/qVEY+RyPDlgAJICniOI1n9eNZgedZKuoGZwffBMTG1c6GdDN7mSPDE7dcIFNIb2Cz8
         SQvA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.219.233 with SMTP id pr9mr3704494wjc.8.1375974992978;
 Thu, 08 Aug 2013 08:16:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.182.193 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 08:16:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ED.E4.06453.42993025@pb1.pair.com>
References: <CE27EF9C.9917%seanc@fb.com>
	<CAPwsocFTxhuoLazpWC8Pt-r7H7vb=7a3G3=L19npQ6GD4CafqA@mail.gmail.com>
	<52037411.7070406@seld.be>
	<CAEp07h9EZXr9iV14tYE8rEgPa0Yyu8OwHYpawzHmVPdmbYWfLw@mail.gmail.com>
	<ED.E4.06453.42993025@pb1.pair.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 16:16:32 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPwsocE0NGj7bhhwea2Zx0O_QzbOVS+pNK12AvEk4AEhSHyURQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Matthieu Napoli <matthieu@mnapoli.fr>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c1b7e6ad29da04e37124a7
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: constructor argument promotion
From: leight@gmail.com (Leigh)

--001a11c1b7e6ad29da04e37124a7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On 8 August 2013 14:12, Matthieu Napoli <matthieu@mnapoli.fr> wrote:

> class MyClass {
>   public $foo;
>   protected $bar;
>
>   public function __construct($this->foo, $this->bar, $baz) {
>     // $this->foo and $this->bar are now set
>

This actually feels _way_ more intuitive to me, it feels like you are
passing the parameter directly into that property.

With that style, why even limit it to the ctor?

function mySetter(array $this->items) {}

--001a11c1b7e6ad29da04e37124a7--