Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:68260 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 47305 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2013 07:45:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Jul 2013 07:45:16 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 108.166.43.99 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 108.166.43.99 smtp99.ord1c.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [108.166.43.99] ([108.166.43.99:53588] helo=smtp99.ord1c.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 84/A0-13120-B004AE15 for ; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 03:45:15 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 3F6391B00C7; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 03:45:11 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp5.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id E511C1B009E; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 03:45:10 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <51EA4006.7060008@sugarcrm.com> Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 00:45:10 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yasuo Ohgaki CC: PHP internals References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Operator precedence is undefined? From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! >> If there aren't comments, I'll rewrite the example. >> >> >> There were comments. I explicitly told you that that the behavior is > defined as undefined. You CHOSE to ignore that comment. You CHOSE to > break the documentation. Besides that, asking for comments and committing the same day is not really conductive to a good discussion. Even if nobody objected - which explicitly wasn't the case - there's nothing that prevented waiting for a couple of days just to be sure. Please, let us not to be too hasty. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227