Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:68232
Return-Path: <yohgaki@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 95355 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2013 00:56:20 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 20 Jul 2013 00:56:20 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=yohgaki@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=yohgaki@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.217.172 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.217.172 mail-lb0-f172.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.217.172] ([209.85.217.172:43701] helo=mail-lb0-f172.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 80/96-13120-230E9E15 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 20:56:19 -0400
Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id v20so3941971lbc.31
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 17:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=f34lrIb9HCdtXnHTvVcgF/Mnvkgqvhw/QhCBcHyidQk=;
        b=dv/P7BZdVJ5cnMNmfMJRyHisxT2KPTJSGRd5psFYko/8uw87M16EmTp0yiMFmurxoG
         jY/lK1jP7su5/UKkqHxgmJiGdaUJqNGC80K99NMkiOjOnZ8whOFfNxc35DOaaol2ut8A
         w6tFzAXPgu/VbGb4Fi6NRlWhuVmOvDu4BOPimIjWDTlC+fec7GMZFVPaI3yitnL4tnHJ
         ud31cTM3OV+lP1C3L39yR1AhzkyZ3tHgxs0HtDeyA51n+1n/UpP5RdhFSjTFI6FtKALk
         vG6EQc1J0uglS6lj9PcmqYNxF9XdfzVD24LYhWoVRei71p75YCeD2EN4zDhjgOAEo8AH
         A5xg==
X-Received: by 10.152.163.101 with SMTP id yh5mr3568548lab.9.1374281775386;
 Fri, 19 Jul 2013 17:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.4.233 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 17:55:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAESVnVrpRmwG-hTwdNu1j60vLriG9PRfis7N8xJUKCEwjgEKaA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGa2bXbWCKBx1=x0Jmo0=L0ixkSx28J4vf71i0g=PHdAyStc4Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAESVnVrpRmwG-hTwdNu1j60vLriG9PRfis7N8xJUKCEwjgEKaA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 09:55:35 +0900
X-Google-Sender-Auth: E_2mdEfGqpx2vwp9OOtI8Hldruo
Message-ID: <CAGa2bXb_763hvMu2e-D9fEXYO2fVgpNP=eByZZW9xH1COTZWeQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sara Golemon <pollita@php.net>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113369a60b145d04e1e6e9a7
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Operator precedence is undefined?
From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki)

--001a113369a60b145d04e1e6e9a7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi Sara,

2013/7/20 Sara Golemon <pollita@php.net>

> I would ask that you don't "fix" the docs, as we want to continue to
> discourage users from engaging in unsafe behaviors.


If precedence is implemented correctly, there should not be any ambiguity.
If precedence is not implemented correctly, I suppose it is a bug as ++/--
have
much higher precedence.

We don't want such docs nor bugs, don't we?
Anyone know if the doc is correct or not?
Thanks in advance.

Regards,

--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohgaki@ohgaki.net

--001a113369a60b145d04e1e6e9a7--