Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:68136 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 71548 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2013 01:21:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Jul 2013 01:21:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=theanomaly.is@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=theanomaly.is@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.212.176 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: theanomaly.is@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.212.176 mail-wi0-f176.google.com Received: from [209.85.212.176] ([209.85.212.176:47080] helo=mail-wi0-f176.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 5B/0B-20914-40347E15 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 21:21:09 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id ey16so6090090wid.15 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 18:21:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=RQAOCxwlOzIWY713L6WBkGzFZRqGiI5a2XyBvW9p9GA=; b=v1XYJwo0DxsmAaK+gpCYd/0+oB/JebZY89xMyAkocqimEQjgMBv1qBaBQjC3pFVGWp 1s1vDE+HZGnreDlrOyLChPmBLlYzoUDwq+CsDYVDAh+7hKbQWVVgjAg/vJucOtzTgU4d VL80EPtVOOh/mp3FHGenHVYLcYwtj7X1ppJH13Wuc3qhlZYKuDiam+3J9WfexSESIOOa nyO0YorTcDxOQHFILScK7Hd2YcdeAd4VIFfEprA1TZrj2OCj6RoItGnOeP0FHer2+SU+ t6Zpe0SfLRFf2oYRQC5Zq1fhbWJFjZ83t7PI+mb7cekAuAo93SZPIVMr+8km4KkhXHPU SdOQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.87.100 with SMTP id w4mr6752976wjz.34.1374110466057; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 18:21:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.207.6 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 18:21:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 21:21:05 -0400 Message-ID: To: Lior Kaplan Cc: PHP internals list , Veres Lajos Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bf10a163629cd04e1bf06b1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Pull requests report (17/7/2013) From: theanomaly.is@gmail.com (Sherif Ramadan) --047d7bf10a163629cd04e1bf06b1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Lior Kaplan wrote: > Merged requests (past 7 days): > #364 fix invalid variable name > at > ext/spl/internal/multipleiterator.inc > #370 Remove PWS (Personal Web > Server) references > #377 Add built-in web server to > cli usage, and align terminology in cli manpage > #378 Fix bug > #62665: > add curl.cainfo to php.ini > #386 Typo fixes > > Thanks Stas for helping these merges happen. > > New (last 7 days): > #384 HASH_KEY_NON_EXISTANT typo > fix > #385 mssql.compatability_mode > typo fix > #387 Wrong value for > FILTER_SANITIZE_FULL_SPECIAL_CHARS > > existing (7-14 days): > #375 Fixed bug > #48770: > when call_user_func() fails to call parent from inheriting class > #381 Fixed > #65225: > PHP_BINARY incorrectly set > #382 Added support for not > canonicalizing the SASL realm on sasl_binds for LDAP > > What do you think about closing older PR ( > 28 days) ? > > First off, thanks for all the hard work. PRs aren't getting as much attention as they should, and I'd like to say that I certainly haven't been helping as much as I should with them. What I am noticing though, is that a lot of these newer PRs, or the ones that are getting more attention, seem to be fairly cosmetic changes. I mean, spelling mistakes are all great fixes, and no disrespect to any contribution small or big, but there are certainly a lot of PRs which people have spent a great deal of time working on, clearly, that seem to be getting ignored. If we start closing these strictly because of how long they've been open it would be such a discouragement to everyone who contributed. I sincerely hope this doesn't happen. I'd much rather see people spending more time on reviewing some of the older PRs and seeing if they're worthy of merging or not based on substance rather than just dismiss them based on how long they've been open. I've tried to get in contact with some of the original authors of at least a couple of PRs in the past weeks to see if they were interested in working on an RFC to get their PRs merged as they necessitated some more discussion, but so far have come up empty. So I'll try to help out as much as I can with the ones that can get immediate attention. --047d7bf10a163629cd04e1bf06b1--