Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:68113
Return-Path: <johannes@schlueters.de>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 26930 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2013 14:03:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 13 Jul 2013 14:03:28 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=johannes@schlueters.de; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=johannes@schlueters.de; sender-id=unknown
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain schlueters.de from 217.114.211.66 cause and error)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: johannes@schlueters.de
X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.114.211.66 config.schlueters.de  
Received: from [217.114.211.66] ([217.114.211.66:39775] helo=config.schlueters.de)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 7A/E4-58645-E2E51E15 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 10:03:27 -0400
Received: from [192.168.2.20] (ppp-188-174-58-89.dynamic.mnet-online.de [188.174.58.89])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by config.schlueters.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B912365B6C;
	Sat, 13 Jul 2013 16:03:23 +0200 (CEST)
To: Sebastian Bergmann <sebastian@php.net>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
In-Reply-To: <51E07D5A.3090409@php.net>
References: <51E07D5A.3090409@php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 16:03:16 +0200
Message-ID: <1373724196.2394.2542.camel@guybrush>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] "Zend Engine v2.5.0-dev" in PHP 5.5.0
From: johannes@schlueters.de (Johannes =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Schl=FCter?=)

On Sat, 2013-07-13 at 00:04 +0200, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
>     Zend Engine v2.5.0-dev, Copyright (c) 1998-2013 Zend Technologies
> 
>  At the end of the day it is just a version number but it looks
>  "unprofessional". Would be nice if things like this did not happen.

Yes, mistakes happen, as you can see by commit 184dea this was already
noticed and fixed. I think there also hand been bug reports about it.
But well, nothing we can change for5.5.0 as that's out ..

johannes