Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:67820
Return-Path: <mike.php.net@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 80354 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2013 18:50:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 25 Jun 2013 18:50:40 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=mike.php.net@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=mike.php.net@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.46 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: mike.php.net@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.46 mail-la0-f46.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.215.46] ([209.85.215.46:38547] helo=mail-la0-f46.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 39/1B-49518-E76E9C15 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 14:50:39 -0400
Received: by mail-la0-f46.google.com with SMTP id eg20so12739508lab.33
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:50:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=sTGuleF5M5yg9oz/WiHru9WPSowyIO0Jdx3J7OGCNcA=;
        b=xcxfNH6nw076FI+sc2yRkw3wz3v/DvJogmTSqTlIA7Nqz5xIprJ1JpCGrMLAXx/Ab4
         /Yg0cf4+EjS/xoNTt1ZCzat6P6nh/xgEq9tau+yAOa1sNdbSB3+Oiky+FyT8KaXCIXsF
         CIMakEcTnry2kVKtztAyOBHowr9nayNdDqre6NbkoORRm6LL5imomxVyhT1lpwsTx6LQ
         4+26JWtUp6Ussxj2qv5Km+qv8GYMfYhRZkuL3MXapmyrgdXSS5DiSCsMtSlDebf08FtP
         UMIpQn44RkP+IyUsUin6xOtg04wJ/LfLpl8wHCeNIgWCTJGd+ymcJ0J1OkKZrv1lh4WN
         da6A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.185.40 with SMTP id ez8mr503641lbc.31.1372186236091;
 Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:50:36 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: mike.php.net@gmail.com
Received: by 10.114.184.47 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:50:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAF+90c8Aa0jV7OJkESYW_hfzFkvBQw9KFC_mEST1wrh-EyX=tw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <etPan.51c8ce38.54e49eb4.5757@MacBook-Air-van-Joost-Koehoorn.local>
	<CAF+90c8Aa0jV7OJkESYW_hfzFkvBQw9KFC_mEST1wrh-EyX=tw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 20:50:36 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: wmtj1fHUbHNya4IzimMb1AxcKW8
Message-ID: <CALJZF3jsVc1b4cMfR+poMGqtEV2=6uRQOv=yZYQf30Z41o58-A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>
Cc: Joost Koehoorn <joost.koehoorn@gmail.com>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Announcing RFC 'Anonymous Catches'
From: mike@php.net (Michael Wallner)

On 25 June 2013 17:07, Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com> wrote:

> No opinion on leaving off $e, but I'm against the generic catch{} statement.

I second the concerns about empty catch{}.

--
Regards,
Mike