Newsgroups: php.doc,php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.doc:969384459 php.internals:67797 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 79902 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2013 09:11:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Jun 2013 09:11:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=johannes@schlueters.de; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=johannes@schlueters.de; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain schlueters.de from 217.114.211.66 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: johannes@schlueters.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.114.211.66 config.schlueters.de Received: from [217.114.211.66] ([217.114.211.66:49775] helo=config.schlueters.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 22/76-49518-3AE59C15 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 05:11:00 -0400 Received: from [192.168.2.20] (ppp-88-217-86-216.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.86.216]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by config.schlueters.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6DD0865D77; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:10:56 +0200 (CEST) To: Christian Stoller Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" , phpdoc In-Reply-To: <4ED7146272E04A47B986ED49E771E347BB4DF6F231@Ikarus.ameusgmbh.intern> References: <4ED7146272E04A47B986ED49E771E347BB4DF6F231@Ikarus.ameusgmbh.intern> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:10:49 +0200 Message-ID: <1372151449.2389.27.camel@guybrush> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Moving PHP documentation to Git repository From: johannes@schlueters.de (Johannes =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Schl=FCter?=) On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 08:46 +0200, Christian Stoller wrote: > Hi internals. > > What do you think about moving the PHP documentation to a Git > repository, mirrored on Github? Doing this would make it possible for > everybody to extend the documentation easily by creating pull > requests. Basically that is good. To the best of my knowledge the issue though, is not will but time. Migrating the docs is not just converting the repo, like with PECL repos but changing the supporting infrastructure. For instance there are tools which help to identify outdated translations and the mentioned editor which all have to be adopted. If you want to help there the docs group certainly would welcome it. That aside: resources is also the issue with the online editor. We have too few people working on docs, so in the end it doesn't make much difference if they don't have time to review edit.php.net or github. (while reviewing on edit.php.net has the benefit that it can directly validate the docbook, github can't) johannes (who is one of the bad people not really actively helping with docs)