Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:67680 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 14415 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2013 17:51:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 Jun 2013 17:51:41 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 108.166.43.99 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 108.166.43.99 smtp99.ord1c.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [108.166.43.99] ([108.166.43.99:43322] helo=smtp99.ord1c.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id F4/DF-30264-C2216B15 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 13:51:41 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 746771B00C7; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 13:51:38 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp5.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id ACD281B016B; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 13:51:37 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <51B61228.2060605@sugarcrm.com> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 10:51:36 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anatol Belski CC: Etienne Kneuss , Gustavo Lopes , Derick Rethans , =?UTF-8?B?Sm9oYW5uZXMgU2NobMO8dGVy?= , PHP internals References: <6dd0f0c5be06dc0713890f2000a0b551.squirrel@webmail.klapt.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: #53437 From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > As I mentioned previously, that small piece is easy fixable, though it > possibly makes that place not portable between 32 and 64 bit. The main > intention is to fix the unserialization crash, which IMHO interleaves this > small deviation. What you mean by not portable? Different code, different var_dump results? -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227