Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:67640 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 38714 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2013 10:45:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Jun 2013 10:45:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 82.113.146.227 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.113.146.227 xdebug.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [82.113.146.227] ([82.113.146.227:44337] helo=xdebug.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 1A/C0-33815-8C9B1B15 for ; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 06:45:29 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by xdebug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA7D8DE13F; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 11:45:25 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 11:45:25 +0100 (BST) X-X-Sender: derick@whisky.home.derickrethans.nl To: Pierre Joye cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Johannes_Schl=C3=BCter?= , Stas Malyshev , PHP internals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: #53437 From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Thu, 6 Jun 2013, Pierre Joye wrote: > On Jun 6, 2013 6:03 PM, "Derick Rethans" wrote: > > > > On Thu, 6 Jun 2013, Pierre Joye wrote: > > > > > The fix for #53437 is around for some time now. It full fills the > > > requirements described by Derick when we discussed the possible > > > fixes. > > > > > > Unless there are strong objections in the next couple of days, I > > > will ask Anatol to apply it on Monday. This is the last remaining > > > crash in 5.3/4 (already applied in 5.5) and needs to be fixed > > > asap. > > > > The last time I checked that it was using weird base64 encoding on > > stuff and I am absolutely against that. Where is the new patch? > > It is in 5.5 and no, it does not used that as stated in the previous > mails. That didn't answer my question though. I asked where the new patch was. cheers, Derick