Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:67570
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.223.170 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4DEE7307.5040608@sugarcrm.com>
References: <BANLkTimU6DxovPQFP6cOXE0sKTDchx5Ltg@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DED3D5B.6030307@oracle.com>
	<BANLkTimEEh7eT7bH4qb9gPro_R2sKw24SyJ7JwWp8j6Ew2fH0Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DEE7307.5040608@sugarcrm.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 08:00:15 +0200
Message-ID: <CAH-PCH6PRg+ERo2mkRhqFF2HH_niMgp2_D+PQufJw07AVTRt-A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>
Cc: Hannes Magnusson <bjori@php.net>, Christopher Jones <christopher.jones@oracle.com>, 
	"internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c231caa418b604ddc0faa3
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Callable typehint
From: tyra3l@gmail.com (Ferenc Kovacs)

--001a11c231caa418b604ddc0faa3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>wrote=
:

> Hi!
>
>
>  Am I now supposed to create a new thread with [RFC] in the subject,
>> wait for minimum 2 weeks, and then create a poll somewhere on the wiki
>> and create new thread with [VOTE] in subject, and wait for another
>> 2weeks and then if accepted by 50%+1 php.net developer, and 60% of the
>> community votes, then I can commit?
>> Thats the current rules of the game?
>>
>
> Not really, we never had 50%+1 rule and I really hope we never will. But
> the rest is close to what is being currently proposed.
>
>
50%+1 is the required majority for changes which doesn't affect the syntax
or the language in some important way(I agree that this RFC would need 2/3
of the votes as it introduces a new typehint), on the other hand we have no
precedence for the community votes.
sorry for resurrecting the thread, but I think that having a Callable
typehint would be nice, and I agree with Etienne that the generic arguments
against typehints doesn't really apply here.

--=20
Ferenc Kov=C3=A1cs
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu

--001a11c231caa418b604ddc0faa3--