Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:67302
Return-Path: <rasmus@lerdorf.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 88872 invoked from network); 4 May 2013 14:33:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 4 May 2013 14:33:59 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=rasmus@lerdorf.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=rasmus@lerdorf.com; sender-id=unknown
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lerdorf.com from 209.85.161.171 cause and error)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: rasmus@lerdorf.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.161.171 mail-gg0-f171.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.161.171] ([209.85.161.171:61789] helo=mail-gg0-f171.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 88/CD-26044-75C15815 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sat, 04 May 2013 10:33:59 -0400
Received: by mail-gg0-f171.google.com with SMTP id r4so391170ggn.16
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sat, 04 May 2013 07:33:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=google.com; s=20120113;
        h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc
         :subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state;
        bh=GI7II2dmZkgrZUB/4RNo5iEMcAj/h5rxo0rCRmp7PIs=;
        b=RrD8B38sDsgTtaNZcGzzDkYZOLIZEhH3i2GSG4su79S7IxZLunEUlQA3pbHzCu1SvI
         sYV6h85qppp+Lk3lD1SUzUAfMmS3QSiGkHm+h/BBPInERzXvSUwYIiOLb6nzEJrBhUFs
         zvw9XNYt2V5pE0YpW0gRc/8CXHJbHhl8o4wZoaO3nK3zOI6GrqnqilF0+xcN1JFrVobF
         PwfXLbHMxnI4Q+yzifMlWGJav5gqzhH/Vab655TLEsTlTWr66WQkVG1iEIgHros/urB3
         31zrbvvhQLO8RL8mavBSJcBsD7BYGfhrlXvJF3foVsLewj5u1ai3ou+yey48yWGmHM3m
         3+IA==
X-Received: by 10.236.114.5 with SMTP id b5mr12764637yhh.120.1367678036056;
        Sat, 04 May 2013 07:33:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.5.201] (ip-64-134-231-241.public.wayport.net. [64.134.231.241])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id c31sm14174815yhn.6.2013.05.04.07.33.42
        for <multiple recipients>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Sat, 04 May 2013 07:33:55 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <51851C3B.9040607@lerdorf.com>
Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 08:33:31 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130404 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Laruence <laruence@php.net>
CC: Anthony Ferrara <ircmaxell@gmail.com>, 
 Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>,
 PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <CABBJUpd40Rnq=Ux5viXeNwkSDO2oUYgT+VznWtU0W-7ZDz5ChA@mail.gmail.com> <CABBJUpfZTiVH8AUNpknZC9y7uD4CP20KvuqtpZkVKfSDgRheAQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAF+90c94mJED9=6vqRAuZMYNfxt6YtcnEuCrhsy2Beh=uBNG9Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABBJUpfDgHHF8FaoC5=V9b70zHTKZKZheeCBQg3DWCPaWKuqkw@mail.gmail.com> <CAF+90c-zC7tHtB11Zv07ubHqBjKEj2tLninXA93BB5hjQngzfg@mail.gmail.com> <CABBJUpf498q9epxACy=jFhxaxiFXYOSnVsSvk1qq8Bzg0oMjUQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAAyV7nEsnMAwZstdFPaKCk-=eEdK-wLrq5JgnOy1-MDn+Ca4aQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABBJUpdWS_y3z9jdHD2_5_tW9dZb29HFQjuNuotH6Eir9iUE5A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABBJUpdWS_y3z9jdHD2_5_tW9dZb29HFQjuNuotH6Eir9iUE5A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl6MynWsW8CtYW5xIyYdnv78XpBC1T/2fpx+Ox43KarG3227LKEBZT736WTcp867npPN1JT
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PROPOSAL]Add second to callback of preg_replace_callback
From: rasmus@lerdorf.com (Rasmus Lerdorf)

On 05/04/2013 08:28 AM, Laruence wrote:
>   and inefficent not always means performance only,  in this case , you
> need to define various functions for different regexs if you use loop style.
> 
>   and do you prefer array_walk or foreach when you try to iteraterly
> process an array?

I certainly prefer foreach over array_walk/array_map because I think the
resulting code is easier to read. It also happens to be faster to use
foreach in every case I have ever tested.

-Rasmus