Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:67188
Return-Path: <johannes@schlueters.de>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 9293 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2013 14:51:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 29 Apr 2013 14:51:11 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=johannes@schlueters.de; sender-id=unknown
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=johannes@schlueters.de; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain schlueters.de from 217.114.211.66 cause and error)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: johannes@schlueters.de
X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.114.211.66 config.schlueters.de  
Received: from [217.114.211.66] ([217.114.211.66:35285] helo=config.schlueters.de)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id F6/11-00193-ED88E715 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 10:51:11 -0400
Received: from [192.168.2.20] (ppp-88-217-80-242.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.80.242])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by config.schlueters.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D48EE65615;
	Mon, 29 Apr 2013 09:44:00 +0200 (CEST)
To: Robert Stoll <rstoll@tutteli.ch>
Cc: 'PHP Internals' <internals@lists.php.net>
In-Reply-To: <000301ce4377$8201ac40$860504c0$@tutteli.ch>
References:
	 <CAMUwpuTUVhZ23kCz8C0abU9FDzxrAat6y8mbOFKTd8gVifUV1Q@mail.gmail.com>
	 <170891005.EmXIrsICLC@rofl>
	 <CAPaKmRmQOaJqKnCNsRQiG4kCOzZLpbQdZ25Jv6AZkmZMr5898A@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAH-PCH5bbLvDj7OtwxTaHXmU2akQDQkcjcHk2QZ__53pj2iqsQ@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAPaKmRmjhoS8U8VkX+RYV63fvprNQxsZmmWMR5yPZhmJKwxJwg@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CA+yzxZiqgueVh7yB1k-3fDW9GijWRKOm=jsyEruG26WJ4hHb7g@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAPaKmRk5FGey0TuDxxBUDta+NU2mxSOKpaw==HRYEN_U4COtaQ@mail.gmail.com>
	 <000301ce4377$8201ac40$860504c0$@tutteli.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 09:45:23 +0200
Message-ID: <1367221523.2723.196.camel@guybrush>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: AW: [PHP-DEV] Continued try blocks
From: johannes@schlueters.de (Johannes =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Schl=FCter?=)

On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 19:46 +0100, Robert Stoll wrote:
> I agree with Amaury. 
> Although, it is rather smelly code to use try/catch as control flow
> instrument, in some situations it is clearer to do it this way. 
> I think the new construct would be especially useful if one just wants to
> log errors (no further exception handling is necessary) as shown in previous
> examples. 

Logging is a different thing from error handling. exceptions are a tool
to handle (exceptional critically?) error situations.

johannes