Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:67078 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 88764 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2013 21:40:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Apr 2013 21:40:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.133 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.133 smtp133.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.133] ([67.192.241.133:54787] helo=smtp133.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D5/46-53062-14F78615 for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 17:40:17 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp23.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 682C42F8C3F; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 17:40:14 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp23.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 135E62F8C39; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 17:40:12 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <51687F3C.5010306@sugarcrm.com> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:40:12 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hannes Magnusson CC: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9oYW5uZXMgU2NobMO8dGVy?= , Julien Pauli , Kalle Sommer Nielsen , Pierre Joye , Pierrick Charron , Xinchen Hui , Leigh , Laruence , Ferenc Kovacs , PHP Internals References: <1365754071.8768.118.camel@guybrush> <516875E8.1010007@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Add a constant to reflect --with-curlwrappers From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > I don't know who suggested getting rid of it in 5.3 or 5.4, that is > ofcourse seriously stupid thing to do. > The original request was to kill it dead in 5.5, and remove the > constant again from 5.3 and 5.4. OK, I agree with that. I think origination of this was Pierre's comment to apply removal patch to 5.4 and 5.3 but maybe it was just misunderstood and he meant removing the constant. Anyway, removing it from 5.5 would be fine IMO. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227