Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:67066 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 24460 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2013 08:06:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Apr 2013 08:06:41 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=johannes@schlueters.de; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=johannes@schlueters.de; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain schlueters.de from 217.114.211.66 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: johannes@schlueters.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.114.211.66 config.schlueters.de Received: from [217.114.211.66] ([217.114.211.66:43515] helo=config.schlueters.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id AC/F2-05511-F80C7615 for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 04:06:40 -0400 Received: from [192.168.2.20] (host-188-174-193-53.customer.m-online.net [188.174.193.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by config.schlueters.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 430AC65C88; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:06:36 +0200 (CEST) To: Julien Pauli Cc: Kalle Sommer Nielsen , Pierre Joye , Pierrick Charron , Hannes Magnusson , Xinchen Hui , Leigh , Laruence , Stas Malyshev , Ferenc Kovacs , PHP Internals In-Reply-To: References: <515BE6C2.7000801@sugarcrm.com> <515C9878.8060603@sugarcrm.com> <7848763017118166753@unknownmsgid> <1365159067.2152.2691.camel@guybrush> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:07:51 +0200 Message-ID: <1365754071.8768.118.camel@guybrush> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Add a constant to reflect --with-curlwrappers From: johannes@schlueters.de (Johannes =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Schl=FCter?=) On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 10:00 +0200, Julien Pauli wrote: > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote: > > > Hi > > > > 2013/4/12 Pierre Joye : > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Pierrick Charron > > wrote: > > >> Including 5.3 and 5.4 ?? > > > > If removed in 5.3 and 5.4, theres no need for the constant anymore. > > > > Right :-) > > I agree with Pierre as well, we know this feature leads to bugs, is > experimental, and is so not very very used. 5.3 users might depend on some part of the behavior and have learned to live with bugs. We shouldn't kick "features" at this stage. johannes