Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:66932 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 40355 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2013 03:40:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Apr 2013 03:40:41 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tyra3l@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tyra3l@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.223.182 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tyra3l@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.223.182 mail-ie0-f182.google.com Received: from [209.85.223.182] ([209.85.223.182:38036] helo=mail-ie0-f182.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 51/8E-07534-836FC515 for ; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 22:40:40 -0500 Received: by mail-ie0-f182.google.com with SMTP id at1so2566994iec.27 for ; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 20:40:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=glCHmu4NY3K8oqwyUcOv+0Ge8QqxIFz8iP0+iY1GUso=; b=rHcRJ0CQBn0JUlol6WUJsZTuHA/Rrl1HzqSfe2NMoXRt+Sh+lEgeE6gHfP9rcBEryj aZMJIKl7rY83QYbAbnClkK+VcB9Ngd/9UOvqnEftYrFOOoYO9c/nQDK/K7iMapdq90Jy X3pJl+vvHR//cKhrkN3VNK8MxlYFY026CmE1QWGWXtwY2QDavdVIrv66m9HJ35Wz0KgW /jvFQs085xlO5gAMwYcduirwuwYhmM5XKm+JRr2RgZu9AmR5JH756aqnSgKJUldc9Pu2 VRx7LzqmC4Kv4YYqWEJzjd+kLciz3kGQb4zLWla669HTpqQi0kiDm+gTQSDzTkgwigIB eKLw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.93.19 with SMTP id v19mr2340506icm.39.1365046837631; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 20:40:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.66.207 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 20:40:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <515BE6C2.7000801@sugarcrm.com> Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 05:40:37 +0200 Message-ID: To: Hannes Magnusson Cc: Laruence , Stas Malyshev , PHP Internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba614d06dc004704d980bbe5 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Add a constant to reflect --with-curlwrappers From: tyra3l@gmail.com (Ferenc Kovacs) --90e6ba614d06dc004704d980bbe5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Hannes Magnusson < hannes.magnusson@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:42 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Laruence wrote: > > > > >> however, you are right, it's not a long time, so if objections > becomes > >> strong, I can revert it. > >> > > > > this is exactly the kind of behavior why we changed from the commit fir= st > > then revert when people complaining to the current approach, where we t= ry > > to reach a concensus (via discussion on the mailing list or voting > through > > RFCs) before introducing a change. > > > I've gotta say, even though I disagree with the commit, writing an RFC > for a new constant is a total WTF. > There is absolutely no need for a RFC for it. > Heck, even that initial curtesy mail was more then I would have expected. > > > > -Hannes > I agree that not every small change requires an RFC (albeit a small change for one can seem a huge change for another) and I think that this is what I wrote originally. I'm glad that Laruence sent the original mail, I just wish that he would have waited another day or two before the commit. My reply was meant to address why it is a bad idea to shrug off the concerns and say that we can revert it later if the complains doesn't stop. --=20 Ferenc Kov=C3=A1cs @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu --90e6ba614d06dc004704d980bbe5--