Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:66927
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.47 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAH-PCH5Lr+yeiXwL0PjRb_M3ki6pPCLdMLCRMjqWE2GvM5H7kw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABBJUpexRYZaXi10UobucCzJUXsLLK9avs+WspdSxyE4vDJ2rA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADNQb0Uo0u2xCbR_joWKmwN9z+77nN-cLQ=Lcq2gpr0hf_A2qA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABBJUpfx__wLqtG0w1SQzveggPiWubGLkPUJMFL+27cz3P_GyQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABBJUpcHuBT6schJm9gDe_tyz=Gvj53dNcs9UKbj2w040pCsiw@mail.gmail.com>
	<515BE6C2.7000801@sugarcrm.com>
	<CABBJUpfFeCwR_L59OsD7ZTtnL4=cNr6HW_boYneUFjKxjKVsqQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH-PCH5Lr+yeiXwL0PjRb_M3ki6pPCLdMLCRMjqWE2GvM5H7kw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 13:42:16 -0700
Message-ID: <CADNQb0XeOE62m-ii-13g637C=RRdtH2j9jSnXB7OkLYwhE7bvw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com>
Cc: Laruence <laruence@php.net>, Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>, 
	PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Add a constant to reflect --with-curlwrappers
From: hannes.magnusson@gmail.com (Hannes Magnusson)

On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:42 AM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Laruence <laruence@php.net> wrote:
>

>>     however, you are right, it's not a long time, so if objections becomes
>> strong,  I can revert it.
>>
>
> this is exactly the kind of behavior why we changed from the commit first
> then revert when people complaining to the current approach, where we try
> to reach a concensus (via discussion on the mailing list or voting through
> RFCs) before introducing a change.


I've gotta say, even though I disagree with the commit, writing an RFC
for a new constant is a total WTF.
There is absolutely no need for a RFC for it.
Heck, even that initial curtesy mail was more then I would have expected.



-Hannes