Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:66901
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.49 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAESVnVr_jLwRbVsOOx3urPv0Qzc9Rc-7y2CNp1T0mH+8ad3cRg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAESVnVr_jLwRbVsOOx3urPv0Qzc9Rc-7y2CNp1T0mH+8ad3cRg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 09:11:35 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU6ova7FNeQ76iUYB-crdcoYwjh79Hn-TSciArK08Rn7Sg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sara Golemon <pollita@php.net>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Simplified Array API for extensions
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

hi Sara,

On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:52 AM, Sara Golemon <pollita@php.net> wrote:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php-array-api

Love it, great work. +1 :)

I would like to kill other APIs in next major as well, time for
cleanup and ease maintenance. Yes, it is a bit more work for
extensions developers but as you plan to do pecl releases as well for
these inlined functions, that should be a good thing in the long run.

What do you think about having the same for hashes? Many
implementations do not work with zval but with hash tables as well,
that would be a perfect combination :)

Cheers,
--
Pierre

@pierrejoye