Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:66843 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 41126 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2013 21:10:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 Mar 2013 21:10:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=dsoria@gmx.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=dsoria@gmx.net; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmx.net designates 212.227.17.20 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: dsoria@gmx.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.227.17.20 mout.gmx.net Received: from [212.227.17.20] ([212.227.17.20:62447] helo=mout.gmx.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 2C/12-30100-82063515 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:10:01 -0500 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.24]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LuJ7B-1UlfzH2SV5-011mYo for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 22:09:56 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2013 21:09:56 -0000 Received: from p4FE3B6C5.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO achird.localdomain) [79.227.182.197] by mail.gmx.net (mp024) with SMTP; 27 Mar 2013 22:09:56 +0100 X-Authenticated: #235172 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18lszZ6U5ElUymqmvDBDEze0NFJ5yGPRhBekHNfzR HdLhEkCkcataUn Message-ID: <51536022.5080202@gmx.net> Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 22:09:54 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130311 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Joye CC: Anatol Belski , David Soria Parra , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Johannes_Schl=FCter?= , Stas Malyshev , PHP Internals , jpauli References: <1364337846.21443.58.camel@ghost> <51533A7A.8060204@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: libmagic 5.14 upgrade From: dsoria@gmx.net (David Soria Parra) On 03/27/2013 09:35 PM, Pierre Joye wrote: > We have done that many times in the past for 5.3 and 5.4. It is > relatively risk free. Even more for 5.5 during beta phase. It does not > add new features but fixes bugs. > > The good side effect is that we can test it well with 5.5 and back > port to 5.3/4 later. I consider it a feature and not a necessary bugfix. In addition anatoly is saying that there are still problems with the patch. Both are reasons for me to believe that upgrading it 1-1.5 month before a final is not worth the risk. I would prefer to be more strict about the "feature freeze" than we were with 5.3 and 5.4. David