Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:66818 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 28474 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2013 09:07:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 26 Mar 2013 09:07:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.48 mail-la0-f48.google.com Received: from [209.85.215.48] ([209.85.215.48:46280] helo=mail-la0-f48.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A9/C5-16933-65561515 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 04:07:35 -0500 Received: by mail-la0-f48.google.com with SMTP id fq13so13140606lab.35 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 02:07:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=AtkfHXpPBo2UNT6G529NKMqubzMyyaY8Hu/P55Th9ZM=; b=y7c7XN7RQLC65zY1uKJ4OvByqwb8PQz+m/oBpY7DwUl6PM25vD/mS6ULVV+RaZH4CX Y9mKgHGCizYxbubDz6div6YW6vklmDrAAqo2uz1JQNnPce3gSTwaQw7PNAXBREVjcAfW d9DUmQ3yd+6J6Ybus1ZlI0jF9XCzWw5P0AOcceotnehnMCVIRgBQoeFSd9S4OgzTdt9G IX65bnmb6Mia8+wVIrrRY8mCgye6AxWQliooWZlk8jQbwrJRdXU6flJQo2rTHeaE4f0w 8v+4rmh9LTRrVE3YgIPn9jVg7XJxvGswAy/tF/oo2VAToTBXuQzb7E0lUlFethB8Do5f vCKg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.104.36 with SMTP id gb4mr7899503lab.13.1364288852242; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 02:07:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.38.199 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 02:07:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1EAB22BE-A5FF-499C-8CD9-6FEE9E4A1CD7@strojny.net> References: <1867201214.20130215192512@cypressintegrated.com> <51248C24.4070609@sugarcrm.com> <51249818.2040308@sugarcrm.com> <5150B224.8020706@php.net> <3F18D4AC-3F8F-466B-AB9A-213F26B2A595@strojny.net> <1EAB22BE-A5FF-499C-8CD9-6FEE9E4A1CD7@strojny.net> Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 10:07:32 +0100 Message-ID: To: Lars Strojny Cc: "internals@lists.php.net Mailing List" , Derick Rethans Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Questions regarding DateTimeImmutable From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Lars Strojny wrote: > Start simple: ask Derick to revert and go through the usual RFC process. > > @Derick: given the overall response on the list, could you revert the introduction of DateTimeImmutable? huge +1. Even more for an extension that can't be disabled and always used as default date handling. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye