Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:66785 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 53297 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2013 02:56:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Mar 2013 02:56:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 108.166.43.83 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 108.166.43.83 smtp83.ord1c.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [108.166.43.83] ([108.166.43.83:50347] helo=smtp83.ord1c.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 8A/B0-43892-7ECBF415 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 21:56:40 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id B69E8501A2; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 22:56:36 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp3.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 650FF50197; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 22:56:36 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <514FBCE3.7060901@sugarcrm.com> Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 19:56:35 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?T25kxZllaiBTdXLDvQ==?= CC: PHP Internals References: <514CC744.8070606@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP5.5 beta 1 is ready From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > It seems that GNU Hurd does implement flock(). I'll talk to Debian > porter team if they can help with the issue there. I suspect it does, the question is - how... Everybody has different struct flock, with same members in different order :( I'll try to add some configure magic to at least catch this on configure stage, but ideally if somebody knows the right autoconf spell to figure it out it'd be great. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227