Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:66754 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 74398 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2013 21:04:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Mar 2013 21:04:09 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 108.166.43.115 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 108.166.43.115 smtp115.ord1c.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [108.166.43.115] ([108.166.43.115:46017] helo=smtp115.ord1c.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 0D/8A-32001-747CC415 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 16:04:08 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp7.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 13EF11B80B1; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 17:04:05 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp7.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id B7C581B8101; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 17:04:04 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <514CC744.8070606@sugarcrm.com> Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 14:04:04 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?T25kxZllaiBTdXLDvQ==?= CC: PHP Internals References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP5.5 beta 1 is ready From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > just FYI, there's some non-portable code in Zend OpCache (alpha5 was built > just fine), which prevents building of php5 beta1 on non-Linux systems: > > FreeBSD: https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=64490 > Hurd i386: > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=php5&arch=hurd-i386&ver=5.5.0~beta1-1&stamp=1363956014 > > While hurd might be not important, the general experience is that writing > portable code helps the general quality of the code :). We probably need to make it self-disable on systems where we don't have suitable flock driver. For freebsd though it's strange since it has if defined(__FreeBSD__) clause there. Is there some other define that should be checked instead? > There might be more, but so far the Linux builds are ok even on some more > exotic archs (like s390{x}): > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=php5&suite=experimental All linux ones should be fine as long as they use the same basic structures, which seems to be the case. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227